<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Psychogeeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psychogeeks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psychogeeks.com</link>
	<description>Ramblings of an armchair astronomer and inveterate geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Stars Blink Out by lee</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/when-stars-blink-out-76/comment-page-1/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/when-stars-blink-out-76/#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>Last night some mates and i all saw a star dissapear and reappear over and over again some times it would only dim other times it would completely vanish then come back really bright it went on for hours we got sick of it and went to bed. it was one of the brightest stars in the night sky.... untill it dimmed. going out tonight to see if happens again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night some mates and i all saw a star dissapear and reappear over and over again some times it would only dim other times it would completely vanish then come back really bright it went on for hours we got sick of it and went to bed. it was one of the brightest stars in the night sky&#8230;. untill it dimmed. going out tonight to see if happens again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jupiter: See it for Yourself by Chris</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/jupiter-see-it-for-yourself-99/comment-page-1/#comment-4412</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/jupiter-see-it-for-yourself-99/#comment-4412</guid>
		<description>The specifics in the article are a bit dated now but I&#039;m glad the general information was useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The specifics in the article are a bit dated now but I&#8217;m glad the general information was useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jupiter: See it for Yourself by ally</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/jupiter-see-it-for-yourself-99/comment-page-1/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/jupiter-see-it-for-yourself-99/#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>wow this helped alot tnx :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow this helped alot tnx <img src='http://psychogeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Isaac Newton by Lily</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/comment-page-1/#comment-3878</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/#comment-3878</guid>
		<description>I love this website its amazin (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this website its amazin (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Isaac Newton by Chris</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/comment-page-1/#comment-3866</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/#comment-3866</guid>
		<description>Isaac Newton used the notion of a force between objects with mass to describe what is observed.  That is, we observe objects falling to Earth with a certain acceleration and in Newtonian physics an acceleration requires a force.  He found that if the force decreased with the square of the distance between the objects then it could explain the elliptical orbits of planets, moons etc.  He also surmised that the force was proportional to the mass of both objects.   Why two massive objects should be attracted to each other is not addressed by Newton.

To address your points:
a) Gravity is present wherever mass is present.  Every massive object is attracting every other massive object.  The standard view is that mass has existed since the big bang; not something that evolved over substantial time.  Mass accumulates to form stars and planets because of gravity.  They could not exist without gravity.  Gravity came before planets and stars.
b) Every substance on Earth, including you, contributes to the gravity of this planet.  Adding more mass increases gravitational attraction. There is no chance or luck involved: gravity exists.  
c) Adding mass increases the gravitational attraction exerted by a body.  Removing mass decreases the attraction.  Material falling to Earth changes Earth&#039;s gravitation by a minuscule amount, as does loss of material like space probes or the outer atmosphere.
d) The gravitational field strength is not constant over the Earth.  It varies with altitude and the presence of mass concentrations in the Earth for example.
e) In common logic the apple falls to Earth, but in reality the Earth also moves toward the apple.  The force between them is identical... it just accelerates the much more massive Earth much less.  It is all about mass and distance.
f) Mass causes gravity and applies to rocks, people, apples, balloons and clouds in the same way.  The force applied by gravity can be opposed by other forces.  In the case of a hot air balloon the opposition comes from the difference in air pressure between the top and bottom of the balloon (buoyancy).  Aircraft do this with lift generated by wings.   An object dropped on Earth falls toward the Earth because it is most strongly attracted in that direction.  An object dropped on the Moon (yes the experiment was done) falls toward the Moon for the same reason.  The Moon falls toward the Earth (orbit) because the attraction of the earth is stronger than the attraction of the Sun... but the attraction to the Sun is there.  Objects placed about 1.5 million kilometres toward the Sun experience roughly equal attraction to the Sun and Earth and tend to stay there (its actually slightly more complicated than that).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isaac Newton used the notion of a force between objects with mass to describe what is observed.  That is, we observe objects falling to Earth with a certain acceleration and in Newtonian physics an acceleration requires a force.  He found that if the force decreased with the square of the distance between the objects then it could explain the elliptical orbits of planets, moons etc.  He also surmised that the force was proportional to the mass of both objects.   Why two massive objects should be attracted to each other is not addressed by Newton.</p>
<p>To address your points:<br />
a) Gravity is present wherever mass is present.  Every massive object is attracting every other massive object.  The standard view is that mass has existed since the big bang; not something that evolved over substantial time.  Mass accumulates to form stars and planets because of gravity.  They could not exist without gravity.  Gravity came before planets and stars.<br />
b) Every substance on Earth, including you, contributes to the gravity of this planet.  Adding more mass increases gravitational attraction. There is no chance or luck involved: gravity exists.<br />
c) Adding mass increases the gravitational attraction exerted by a body.  Removing mass decreases the attraction.  Material falling to Earth changes Earth&#8217;s gravitation by a minuscule amount, as does loss of material like space probes or the outer atmosphere.<br />
d) The gravitational field strength is not constant over the Earth.  It varies with altitude and the presence of mass concentrations in the Earth for example.<br />
e) In common logic the apple falls to Earth, but in reality the Earth also moves toward the apple.  The force between them is identical&#8230; it just accelerates the much more massive Earth much less.  It is all about mass and distance.<br />
f) Mass causes gravity and applies to rocks, people, apples, balloons and clouds in the same way.  The force applied by gravity can be opposed by other forces.  In the case of a hot air balloon the opposition comes from the difference in air pressure between the top and bottom of the balloon (buoyancy).  Aircraft do this with lift generated by wings.   An object dropped on Earth falls toward the Earth because it is most strongly attracted in that direction.  An object dropped on the Moon (yes the experiment was done) falls toward the Moon for the same reason.  The Moon falls toward the Earth (orbit) because the attraction of the earth is stronger than the attraction of the Sun&#8230; but the attraction to the Sun is there.  Objects placed about 1.5 million kilometres toward the Sun experience roughly equal attraction to the Sun and Earth and tend to stay there (its actually slightly more complicated than that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Isaac Newton by Thomaseli</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/comment-page-1/#comment-3864</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomaseli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 01:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/#comment-3864</guid>
		<description>Many queries have to be raised pertaining to the establishment of the principality of gravity:

a) What causes gravity to be created in this universe/earth?  The theory of gravity has been used to explain the work of the support of the universe  in order to enable the universe to maintain its operation.  What causes gravity to be created since beginning?  If the world is formed through evolution, how could gravity come about through the creation of earth/universe?

b) What substance to cause gravity to exist on earth?   Is it by chance or by luck?  What factors that cause gravity to exist permanently on earth/universe?

c) Would gravity be reduced or increased by external factors/influence?

d) If gravity on earth has to maintained at certain rate or number, what factors that cause the gravity to be stagnant and unchangeable?

e) As apples are always dropped to the earth, the gravity should be from the earth that causes apples to drop.  What factors that come from the earth that contributes gravity that causes substance to drop?

f) As apples are always dropped to the earth, the air, cloud, sky and etc. do not seem to have gravity, why is it that gravity is always directed from earth and not elsewhere?  What causes it then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many queries have to be raised pertaining to the establishment of the principality of gravity:</p>
<p>a) What causes gravity to be created in this universe/earth?  The theory of gravity has been used to explain the work of the support of the universe  in order to enable the universe to maintain its operation.  What causes gravity to be created since beginning?  If the world is formed through evolution, how could gravity come about through the creation of earth/universe?</p>
<p>b) What substance to cause gravity to exist on earth?   Is it by chance or by luck?  What factors that cause gravity to exist permanently on earth/universe?</p>
<p>c) Would gravity be reduced or increased by external factors/influence?</p>
<p>d) If gravity on earth has to maintained at certain rate or number, what factors that cause the gravity to be stagnant and unchangeable?</p>
<p>e) As apples are always dropped to the earth, the gravity should be from the earth that causes apples to drop.  What factors that come from the earth that contributes gravity that causes substance to drop?</p>
<p>f) As apples are always dropped to the earth, the air, cloud, sky and etc. do not seem to have gravity, why is it that gravity is always directed from earth and not elsewhere?  What causes it then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Isaac Newton by sandeep</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/isaac-newton/#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>I love NEWTON. Because he has discovered many things in both PHYSICS &amp; MATHS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love NEWTON. Because he has discovered many things in both PHYSICS &amp; MATHS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exploring the Solar System (HET602) by Chris</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/astronomy/exploring-the-solar-system-het602/comment-page-1/#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 04:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/astronomy/gravitational-effects-in-the-solar-system-het602-essay/#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>It has obviously been a few years since I finished this course so things may have changed.  

When I started the CMTs were fairly basic.  They started tightening them up toward the end of my course when they also moved to using Blackboard to manage much of the interaction.  The tests were largely multi-choice and short answers but that does not necessarily mean easy.

Each unit was scheduled so that  you had to show progress and submit parts of the work at regular intervals.  I cannot remember the exactly timing, but I think I always started work in earnest on the project after the earliest CMT.   The &quot;Major Project&quot; units ran slightly differently, with an early justify your project submission and a weekly diary submission.

Apart from one semester I took off work, I did two units at a time with a full-time job.  It was a manageable with a bit of discipline.  With the projects, you can generally choose a topic to suit your interests and available time.  If you have a 50 hr/week job, four kids and a live-in mother-in-law then you might struggle :)   I made heavy use of my daily train to/from work to keep up the reading.   The early units (like this one) are no too taxing in any case.

Cheers,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has obviously been a few years since I finished this course so things may have changed.  </p>
<p>When I started the CMTs were fairly basic.  They started tightening them up toward the end of my course when they also moved to using Blackboard to manage much of the interaction.  The tests were largely multi-choice and short answers but that does not necessarily mean easy.</p>
<p>Each unit was scheduled so that  you had to show progress and submit parts of the work at regular intervals.  I cannot remember the exactly timing, but I think I always started work in earnest on the project after the earliest CMT.   The &#8220;Major Project&#8221; units ran slightly differently, with an early justify your project submission and a weekly diary submission.</p>
<p>Apart from one semester I took off work, I did two units at a time with a full-time job.  It was a manageable with a bit of discipline.  With the projects, you can generally choose a topic to suit your interests and available time.  If you have a 50 hr/week job, four kids and a live-in mother-in-law then you might struggle <img src='http://psychogeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />    I made heavy use of my daily train to/from work to keep up the reading.   The early units (like this one) are no too taxing in any case.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exploring the Solar System (HET602) by James</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/astronomy/exploring-the-solar-system-het602/comment-page-1/#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/astronomy/gravitational-effects-in-the-solar-system-het602-essay/#comment-3581</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

How did you find the CMTs (Computer Managed Tests) when doing SAO? What are they like? I&#039;m just wondering how I&#039;ll balance the essay, weekly postings, a project and the CMTs all at once over two units while working.

I was thinking I might start in earnest on the projects after the essay is submitted, otherwise I might go insane from work... being a complete newbie does have its pitfalls!

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>How did you find the CMTs (Computer Managed Tests) when doing SAO? What are they like? I&#8217;m just wondering how I&#8217;ll balance the essay, weekly postings, a project and the CMTs all at once over two units while working.</p>
<p>I was thinking I might start in earnest on the projects after the essay is submitted, otherwise I might go insane from work&#8230; being a complete newbie does have its pitfalls!</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exploring the Solar System (HET602) by Brad</title>
		<link>http://psychogeeks.com/astronomy/exploring-the-solar-system-het602/comment-page-1/#comment-3202</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychogeeks.com/astronomy/gravitational-effects-in-the-solar-system-het602-essay/#comment-3202</guid>
		<description>Cheers for all the information.

I&#039;ve just started the SAO course, and was looking for some examples of projects to help guide me in what they were looking for (I got told they didn&#039;t provide example projects).

Cheers again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for all the information.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just started the SAO course, and was looking for some examples of projects to help guide me in what they were looking for (I got told they didn&#8217;t provide example projects).</p>
<p>Cheers again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

